• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number Z95L
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Injury (2348); Burn, Thermal (2530); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 05/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The dentist refused to provide information about the patient's id, age and weight in the conversation with nakanishi.
 
Event Description
On may 25, 2018, nakanishi received a phone call from a dealer about an nsk handpiece overheating.Upon receipt of the information, nakanishi visited the dental office for further information about the event.The details nakanishi obtained from the dentist are as follows.The event occurred on (b)(6) 2018.The dentist was performing a cavity preparation of tooth #3 of the patient's upper right jaw using the handpiece z95l (serial no.(b)(4)).The patient was not under anesthesia.During the procedure, the patient complained about the handpiece overheating.The dentist found a one-centimeter burn injury on the patient's upper right lip.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device that included measuring the operating temperature of the device [c180528-04].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject z95l device [serial (b)(4)].There were no problems observed during the manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.There were also no repair history records since the device was shipped.B) nakanishi conducted temperature testing of the returned device in the following manner: b.1) temperature sensors were attached to the exterior of the device at various test points.This included the point most proximal to the patient (testing point (1)) and points further toward the distal end of the device (testing points (2) through (4)).The test setup was prepared to take temperature measurements at all points simultaneously, including a reference measurement at ambient room temperature.B.2) nakanishi attached a thermocouple (sensor to measure a temperature) to each of the testing points.Nakanishi rotated the device's motor at 40,000 min-1, which is the maximum rpm for the motor that drives the handpiece (200,000 min-1 for the handpiece), with water spray, and measured the exothermic response.B.3) nakanishi measured the temperature rise of the returned handpiece set at 200,000 min-1 (motor revolution 40,000 min-1).Nakanishi observed an abnormal temperature rise at test point (1) and (2) a few seconds after the start.Temperature measurements 21 seconds after the start are as follows: test point (1): 70.8 degrees c, test point (2): 95.0 degrees c, test point (3): 44.5 degrees c, test point (4): 28.3 degrees c, the rise in temperature was so sudden that the test was concluded 21 seconds into the planned 5 minute evaluation period.Identification of the specific failure mode(s) and/or mechanism(s) and the associated device components involved: a) nakanishi disassembled the handpiece and performed a visual inspection of the inside parts.Nakanishi observed that the bearing retainer (ball retaining part) on the cartridge rear side was broken.B) nakanishi took photographs of all of the disassembled parts and kept them in the investigation report (b)(4).Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: 1) nakanishi identified that the cause of the overheating of the returned device was abnormal resistance during rotation caused by the broken bearing due to the ingress of undesirable materials into the bearing.2) a lack of maintenance causes the accumulation of debris on the inside parts, which causes debris ingress into the bearing during rotation.This contributes to the handpiece overheating.3) in order to prevent a recurrence of the handpiece overheating, nakanishi took the following actions: 3.1) nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.3.2) nakanishi reported the above evaluation results to the dentist and reminded the dentist of the importance of pre-use checks and maintenance, as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NSK
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
kenneth block
800 e campbell rd.
suite 202
richardson, TX 75081
9724809554
MDR Report Key7600472
MDR Text Key111015965
Report Number9611253-2018-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K972569
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Dentist
Device Model NumberZ95L
Device Catalogue NumberC1034
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/30/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/25/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/14/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/06/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/07/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-