Catalog Number 1012016-120 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Positioning Failure (1158); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204)
|
Event Date 06/14/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The armada 18 device referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch manufacturer report reference number.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately tortuous, heavily calcified de novo lesion in the mid femoral artery.A 4.0 x 40mm armada balloon dilatation catheter was advanced to the lesion, but air was noted as leaking from the catheter.Then a 7.0 x 120mm absolute pro stent-delivery system crossed the lesion without issue.During deployment, about 1/3 of the stent was partially deployed.The release mechanism got hard, resistance was felt until a break occurred, which consequently broke the stent in pieces.The stent was removed, but some pieces remained in the artery.Then three omnilink elite (ole) stents were used to treat the lesion.The physician had one of the ole stents deploy over the portion of the absolute pro stent that remained in the artery.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number: (b)(4).Evaluation summary: a visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The deployment failure and thumbwheel resistance were unable to be confirmed due to the condition of the returned device.The partial handle separation and stent separation were confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no indication of a lot specific issue.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the initially filed mdr report, the account confirmed that the leak for the armada balloon catheter was noted near the hub (outside of the anatomy).The device was simply removed without issue.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|