• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1010127-20
Device Problem Inaccurate Delivery (2339)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/21/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant medical products: sheath: 6f terumo destination, embolic protection: emboshield nav6 6 eps.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformance's that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the complaint handling database revealed no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported inaccurate delivery.It may be possible that anatomical conditions contributed to the inaccurate delivery; however, this could not be confirmed.The additional treatment was due to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a concentric de novo lesion in the proximal internal carotid artery with 95-99% narrowing and 8-10mm of mild calcification.An emboshield nav6 embolic protection system was advanced and placed distal to the lesion.Subsequently, a non-abbott balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was advanced to the lesion and pre-dilation was performed.A 6x20mm acculink rx self-expanding stent system was then advanced to the lesion and the stent was slowly deployed by the physician.During deployment, a distal dislocation of the stent was observed.The physician pulled at the delivery system to keep the stent in the target lesion; however, the implanted stent covered 50% of the target lesion, and the remaining portion of the stent was almost fully implanted distal to the target lesion, with narrowing at the proximal stent entry.A 5.0x20mm viatrac bdc was used to post-dilate the narrowing.Finally, a 9x7x40mm xact stent was implanted, with a 10mm overlap into the implanted acculink stent and approximately 20mm over the carotid bifurcation.There was no adverse patient sequela and no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7646041
MDR Text Key112596697
Report Number2024168-2018-05106
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P040012
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/28/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/28/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number1010127-20
Device Lot Number7082161
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/21/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-