As reported, a precise pro rx (us carotid syst) was delivered to the lesion and the physician deployed the stent.Then the physician tried to remove the delivery system, however, the distal tip of the stent delivery system got caught on the stent.A non-cordis guiding catheter was inserted inside the stent to cover the stent delivery system, and it went through the precise pro.The delivery system was removed from the patient and it was confirmed to be separated.The lesion was the right internal carotid artery.There was no reported patient injury.The product was clinically used and will be returned for analysis.There were no anomalies noted prior to or during use of the device.No piece of the stent or the stent delivery system remained in the patient.The physician commented as follows; anatomically there was severe angulation from the right common carotid artery to the right internal carotid artery that was distal from the bifurcation, therefore the distal tip of the stent delivery system might have been caught by the stent.Per fal analysis, two units were received.For one unit: a frayed/ripped/split condition was observed on the "brite tip" and was received partially deployed.For the second unit: an unraveled/stretched condition was observed on the coil wire and the catheter tip was observed separate from the delivery system.
|
Complaint conclusion: during a carotid artery stenting procedure, a precise pro rx carotid stent system 10 mm x 40 mm was delivered to the lesion and the stent was deployed.When the physician tried to remove the delivery system, the distal tip got caught on the stent.A non-cordis guiding catheter was inserted inside the stent to cover the stent delivery system, and it went through the precise pro.The delivery system was removed from the patient and it was noted to be separated.The lesion is the right internal carotid artery.There was no reported patient injury.There were no anomalies noted prior to or during use of the device.No piece of the stent or the stent delivery system remained in the patient.Vessel characteristics were reported as severe angulation from the right common carotid artery to the right internal carotid artery that was distal from the bifurcation.The devices were returned for analysis.Two non-sterile precise pro rx carotid stent system 10 mm x 40 mm units were received coiled inside in plastic bag, the devices were numbered/identified as unit one to two.Per visual analysis an unraveled/stretched condition was noted on the coil wire and the catheter tip was observed separated from the delivery system.The hemostasis valve was received open.No other damages/anomalies were observed.A phr could not be performed since complaint lot is unknown.It is unclear based on the event description which device the customer experienced difficulty with.The event reported by the customer as ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses- withdrawal difficulty - snagged/caught on stent¿ could not be properly evaluated during the analysis due to the nature of the complaint; however, per the condition of the received device it was determined that the exact cause of the reported failure could be related to the damages found.The event reported as ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses - separated - in patient¿ was not confirmed due to no separations being found on device.The events reported by the customer as ¿catheter tip- frayed/split/torn¿ and ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses- deployment difficulty - partial deployment¿ were confirmed due to the condition of received the device for analysis.The exact cause of the events reported could not be conclusively determined.Per the instructions for use, which is not intended as a mitigation, ¿while using fluoroscopy, withdraw the entire delivery system as one unit, over the guidewire and out of the body.Remove the delivery device from the guidewire.Note: if any resistance is met during delivery system withdrawal, advance the outer sheath until the outer sheath marker contacts the catheter tip and withdraw the system as one unit.(do not remove guidewire.).¿ however, neither the phr review nor the product analyses suggest that the damages found on units could be related to manufacturing process.Procedural factors and handling process may have contributed to the damages found.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions will be taken at this time.
|