• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX US CAROTID SYST; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX US CAROTID SYST; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number PC1040RXC
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/26/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported complaint.Product evaluation revealed the following: two non-sterile precise pro rx us carotid syst units were received coiled inside in plastic bag.The unit were numbered/identified as unit one to two.Unit#2: per visual analysis an unraveled/stretched condition was observed on coil wire and the catheter tip was observed separated from the delivery system.The hemostasis valve was received open.No other damages/anomalies were observed.The outer sheath diameter (od) was measured at different distances and results were found within specification.During the analysis it was concluded that unusual forces/tension was applied on the units.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
As reported, a precise pro rx (us carotid syst) was delivered to the lesion and the physician deployed the stent.Then the physician tried to remove the delivery system, however, the distal tip of the stent delivery system got caught on the stent.A non-cordis guiding catheter was inserted inside the stent to cover the stent delivery system, and it went through the precise pro.The delivery system was removed from the patient and it was confirmed to be separated.The lesion was the right internal carotid artery.There was no reported patient injury.The product was clinically used and will be returned for analysis.There were no anomalies noted prior to or during use of the device.No piece of the stent or the stent delivery system remained in the patient.The physician commented as follows; anatomically there was severe angulation from the right common carotid artery to the right internal carotid artery that was distal from the bifurcation, therefore the distal tip of the stent delivery system might have been caught by the stent.Per fal analysis, two units were received.For one unit: a frayed/ripped/split condition was observed on the "brite tip" and was received partially deployed.For the second unit: an unraveled/stretched condition was observed on the coil wire and the catheter tip was observed separate from the delivery system.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint conclusion: during a carotid artery stenting procedure, a precise pro rx carotid stent system 10 mm x 40 mm was delivered to the lesion and the stent was deployed.When the physician tried to remove the delivery system, the distal tip got caught on the stent.A non-cordis guiding catheter was inserted inside the stent to cover the stent delivery system, and it went through the precise pro.The delivery system was removed from the patient and it was noted to be separated.The lesion is the right internal carotid artery.There was no reported patient injury.There were no anomalies noted prior to or during use of the device.No piece of the stent or the stent delivery system remained in the patient.Vessel characteristics were reported as severe angulation from the right common carotid artery to the right internal carotid artery that was distal from the bifurcation.The devices were returned for analysis.Two non-sterile precise pro rx carotid stent system 10 mm x 40 mm units were received coiled inside in plastic bag, the devices were numbered/identified as unit one to two.Per visual analysis an unraveled/stretched condition was noted on the coil wire and the catheter tip was observed separated from the delivery system.The hemostasis valve was received open.No other damages/anomalies were observed.A phr could not be performed since complaint lot is unknown.It is unclear based on the event description which device the customer experienced difficulty with.The event reported by the customer as ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses- withdrawal difficulty - snagged/caught on stent¿ could not be properly evaluated during the analysis due to the nature of the complaint; however, per the condition of the received device it was determined that the exact cause of the reported failure could be related to the damages found.The event reported as ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses - separated - in patient¿ was not confirmed due to no separations being found on device.The events reported by the customer as ¿catheter tip- frayed/split/torn¿ and ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses- deployment difficulty - partial deployment¿ were confirmed due to the condition of received the device for analysis.The exact cause of the events reported could not be conclusively determined.Per the instructions for use, which is not intended as a mitigation, ¿while using fluoroscopy, withdraw the entire delivery system as one unit, over the guidewire and out of the body.Remove the delivery device from the guidewire.Note: if any resistance is met during delivery system withdrawal, advance the outer sheath until the outer sheath marker contacts the catheter tip and withdraw the system as one unit.(do not remove guidewire.).¿ however, neither the phr review nor the product analyses suggest that the damages found on units could be related to manufacturing process.Procedural factors and handling process may have contributed to the damages found.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions will be taken at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received and identified unit #2 reported under this case (case-2018-00028059-2) corresponds to the reported events under case-2018-00028059-1 (manufacturer report number: 9616099-2018-02074).A correction has been sent to address the product analysis under manufacturer report number: 9616099-2018-02074.Therefore; no subsequent reports will be sent through this complaint.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISE PRO RX US CAROTID SYST
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
MDR Report Key7648105
MDR Text Key112892504
Report Number9616099-2018-02219
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P030047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/28/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPC1040RXC
Device Catalogue NumberPC1040RXC
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/07/2018
Date Manufacturer Received07/24/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CATHETER (8F OPTIMO, TOKAI MEDICAL PRODUCTS)
-
-