Catalog Number 26-1221 |
Device Problem
Failure to Auto Stop (2938)
|
Patient Problems
Tissue Damage (2104); Brain Injury (2219)
|
Event Date 06/07/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi - (b)(4).It has been reported that the device will be returned for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the affiliate, a perforator failed to disengage, becoming stuck in the patient's brain.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional event information has been provided.This report has been updated to reflect the updated information.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received 06 july 2018: the event occurred (b)(6) 2018.To resolve the issue, the trephine was removed and haemostasis of the cerebral cortex.There was a cerebral contusion regarding the threphine hole.It was reported that there was language impairment in postoperative, but was probably linked to the tumor for which the female patient has been operated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi : (b)(4).Corrected field: device available for evaluation.It was previously reported that the device would be returned for evaluation.Multiple attempts to obtain the sample were not successful.This report has been updated with the corrected information.Complaint sample was not returned to codman; therefore, an evaluation of the device could not be performed.A review of manufacturing records found no anomalies when the device was released.The cause(s) of the difficulty reported by the customer could not be determined.If the complaint sample becomes available, this complaint will be reopened, and the respective evaluation performed.Trends will be monitored for this or similar complaints.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: pma/510k, if follow-up, what type, device evaluated by mfr.The device was returned for evaluation.The perforator was visually inspected, no anomalies observed.Functional testing was then performed.A series of holes were drilled per the test method; no issues found.The device functioned as expected.A review of manufacturing records found the device conformed to specification when released to stock.Based on the results of the investigation, the reported issue could not be reproduced.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been returned for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|