Medtronic received information that immediately post implant of this 27 mm aortic bioprosthetic valve in a patient with a large aortic annulus and small sinotubular junction, the valve was tested and found to be performing as expected.An unknown time post operatively, functioning of the valve was found to be inadequate."mechanical" damage during the implant is believed to have caused improper valve functioning.The surgeon was unable to provide additional details surrounding the damage.The patient was brought back into the operating room and the valve removed and replaced with a valve of the same size and model.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
|
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, visual inspection revealed that the stent post appeared slightly distorted.A cut was observed at approximately 10mm long on the outer cloth of the right non-coronary stent post.There was damage to the outflow rail adjacent to the left cusp (lc), as well as damage to the sewing cuff adjacent to the left right (lr) stent post.All leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible.All leaflets are in a semi - relaxed position which is a normal finding for this valve as it is processed with the leaflets in relaxed state.A tear along the belly of the right cusp (rc) of approximately 9mm long was observed.All commissures were found to be intact.The device was visually inspected by manufacturing quality and confirmed the damage on the leaflet.Due to the leaflet tear, functional testing could not be performed.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Prior to release for distribution, each mosaic valve must pass tests to ensure coaptation and leaflet characteristics meet specification.Therefore, it is unlikely that the tear occurred during manufacturing or prior to distribution.Based on the received information and analysis of the returned device, the clinical observation was confirmed.The probable cause of the tear is the valve accidentally coming in contact with a sharp instrument.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|