• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA CANADA CORP PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA CANADA CORP PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS23
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/15/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Given that the valve was ultimately implanted successfully following additional proctoring regarding the appropriate tension on the guiding sutures, the event can reasonably be attributed to the inexperience and training of the surgeon.Based on the successful implant of the device, there is no information to suggest device deficiency.The trace paravalvular leak identified after re-implantation was attributed to slight malpositioning of the valve, which can similarly be related to the surgeon's experience.As such, no further investigation is warranted.This mdr has already been submitted july 10, 2018 and resubmitted due to missing 3rd acknowledgment.Device still implanted.
 
Event Description
Summary: a perceval pvs23 was implanted via full sternotomy.The valve was reportedly sized appropriately in the presence of a proctor.The valve was collapsed and deployed; however, echocardiography revealed central and paravalvular leak after coming off bypass.The valve appeared to be tilted in the annulus.Cardiopulmonary bypass was re-established and cross clamp was applied.Visual inspection confirmed that the valve was tilted.The valve was removed using the z-maneuver, then re-collapsed and re-implanted off label.The valve was re-implanted with additional coaching from the proctor on the tension of the guiding sutures.The valve was re-collapsed, re-deployed, and the aortotomy was closed.The second cross-clamp time was 24 minutes.Echocardiography revealed trace pvl, and it was suggested that this may be due to the valve being slightly tilted in the annulus.It was decided that the valve would be left in place.The mean gradient was 13 mmhg.It was reported that the patient was not affected, and was successfully weaned from bypass and transferred to icu.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J5M 1
CA  V5J5M1
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J5M 1
CA   V5J5M1
Manufacturer Contact
francesca crovato
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J5M-1
CA   V5J5M1
MDR Report Key7693123
MDR Text Key114140497
Report Number3004478276-2018-00237
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00896208000429
UDI-Public(01)00896208000429(240)ICV1209(17)201117
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/15/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/17/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/17/2020
Device Model NumberPVS23
Device Catalogue NumberICV1209
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/17/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-