Catalog Number EVX35-06-150-120 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/14/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
The physician used an everflex entrust with a non-medtronic 6fr sheath and a non-medtronic 0.035" guidewire to treat a 260mm calcified/plaque lesion in the patients proximal right superficial femoral artery (sfa) of diameter 6mm.The lesion exhibited 70-80% stenosis.Moderate calcification and tortuousity were reported.The ifu was followed and the device prepped without issue.Pre-dilation of the entire sfa was carried out using a non-medtronic pta balloon.An everflex entrust self-expanding stent, which was prepped with no issues noted, was deployed successfully in the mid sfa.Following this the physician wanted to deploy a second overlapping everflex entrust in the proximal sfa but during advancement of the device over the non-medtronic guidewire, it was met with resistance and was unable to cross the lesion.The physician made a few attempts to advance the everflex entrust unsuccessfully.When the physician attempted to remove the device, difficulty was experienced.The everflex entrust had to be removed with the non-medtronic guidewire as a whole.A new non-medtronic guidewire was opened and the procedure was completed by deployment of a non-medtronic self-expanding stent.No patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation summary: the everflex entrust stent delivery system was received for evaluation.No cine images were received for evaluation.The entrust sds was received loaded on a 0.035¿ compatible guidewire.Push and pull forces were applied to the proximal end of the guidewire: no advancement in either direction was achieved.Push and pull forces were applied to the distal end of the guidewire: no advancement in either direction was achieved.The entrust sds was locked up on the guidewire.The entrust sds was received with the red safety tab still engaged with the sds handle.The distal tip of the outer sheath was examined.Distal radiopaque marker hoops of the stent could be seen in the clear section of the distal tip.The distal end of the isolation sheath was approximately 54.4cm proximal of the distal tip of the sds outer sheath.A separation of the isolation sheath was noted approximately 83.5cm proximal of the distal tip of the sds outer sheath.The guidewire proximal to the proximal hub of the entrust sds handle exhibited areas of where the guidewire coating/jacket was bunched up and the guidewire core wire was exposed.The coating/jacket of the guidewire had slid proximal over its proximal end.From approximately 64.8cm to 70.5cm from the proximal end of the guidewire, the guidewire coating/jacket exhibited damage.From approximately 75.0cm to 86.2cm the guidewire coating/jacket had separated exposing the guidewire core wire.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|