It was reported that the patient underwent a surgical procedure for revision to a tarsometatarsal fusion and the paragon 28 staple was used to revise.The surgery took place on (b)(6) 2017.During post-operative care, the staple broke and was removed in a revision surgery that took place on (b)(6) 2018.There was a non-union at the site.During evaluation and investigation, the broken staple was evaluated.It was found to be broken across the bridge of the device.There was no other visible damage to the part.The dhr records of implants involved with the case were reviewed.All records indicate the implants were manufactured according to specification.
|