• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. GYNECARE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. GYNECARE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Erosion (1750)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Attempts are being made to obtain the additional information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products involved? citation: int urogynecol j (2013) 24:1123¿1126, doi 10.1007/s00192-012-1961-2, published online: 3 november 2012.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: "title : lack of effect of concomitant stage ii cystocele repair on lower urinary tract symptoms and surgical outcome after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: randomized controlled trial" author: hyoung keun park , sung hyun paick , yong soo lho , gwoan youb choo , hyeong gon kim , jaekyung choi citation: int urogynecol j (2013) 24:1123¿1126, doi 10.1007/s00192-012-1961-2, published online: 3 november 2012.The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the lower urinary tract symptom changes and surgical outcome between the tension-free vaginal tape (tvt) procedure with and without concomitant stage ii pelvic organ prolapse (cystocele) repair in a randomized clinical trial setting.Between march 2008 and june 2010, 99 women were successfully randomized and included in the study.The final analysis was performed in 91 cases (45 in the tvt only group and 46 in the concomitant cystocele repair group).During the procedure, the cystocele repair procedure was performed with gynemesh.Although there was no case of erosion in the tvt only group, two cases of vaginal erosion were identified in the concomitant repair group during the follow-up period.In conclusion, in patients with stage ii cystocele and sui, there was no difference in the surgical outcome and lower urinary tract symptoms between the tvt sling only group and concomitant repair group.Cystocele repair can be safely omitted in patients with stage ii cystocele.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GYNECARE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
road 183, km. 8.3
san lorenzo PR
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7749981
MDR Text Key116042240
Report Number2210968-2018-74888
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTO
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K013718
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/05/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-