• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. GYNECARE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. GYNECARE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Device Problems Material Erosion (1214); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Not Applicable (3189)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Citation: int urogynecol j (2009) 20:523¿531; doi 10.1007/s00192-009-0818-9.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: "title : complications from vaginally placed mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery." author: roberta e.Blandon & john b.Gebhart & emanuel c.Trabuco & christopher j.Klingele.Citation: int urogynecol j (2009) 20:523¿531; doi 10.1007/s00192-009-0818-9.This retrospective study aimed to describe complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.From jan2003 to sep2007, 21 female patients (mean age of 61 [sd of 11]) presented complications after pelvic reconstruction surgical procedures for the treatment of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse were included.Of these patients, meshes used were gynemesh, prolene mesh and prolift mesh.In some patients, prolene sutures were used to fix the mesh.Presenting symptoms included dyspareunia (n=10) for which one patient opted to try vaginal dilators, chronic vaginal drainage (n=9), pain not related to intercourse (n=7) for which one who had persistent pelvic pain underwent reoperation, pelvic organ prolapse symptoms (n=7), stress urinary incontinence (n=6) of which 3 had repeat surgeries, urinary urgency (n=6), urge incontinence (n=4), constipation (n=4), vaginal bleeding/spotting (n=3), urinary retention (n=3) and fecal urgency (n=2).Mesh erosion was observed in 12 patients of which four had erosions at more than one site treated with complete vaginal mesh excision and additional excision of eroded mesh from bladder/urethra (n=2).Other surgical interventions (n=16) included anterior colporrhaphy (n=5), posterior colporrhaphy (n=7), vaginal vault prolapse repair (n=5), abdominal sacrocolpopexy with mesh (n=3), autologous rectus fascia sling (n=4), and synthetic midurethral sling (n=1).Five patients opted for a conservative non-surgical approach.In this study, the surgical technique may contribute to the development of these complications and emphasizes the need for specialized training.Use of vaginal mesh for pelvic reconstruction can produce complications.Multiple interventions may be necessary, and bothersome symptoms may persist.Per table 2 (pelvic floor surgeries before referral): patient #1: procedure: lavh, gynemesh bilateral ssl fixation, gynemesh a&p repair; gynemesh bilateral pvdr, tvt sling, cystoscopy.Patient underwent procedure for composite cystocele/rectocele/enterocele repair and bilateral mesh repair and division of gynemesh; underwent procedure for division of painful left uterosacral band (gynemesh).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GYNECARE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
road 183, km. 8.3
san lorenzo 00754
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7754717
MDR Text Key116216987
Report Number2210968-2018-74942
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K013718
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/12/2018
Initial Date FDA Received08/06/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-