As reported, approximately twenty-two months post stent implantation the precise pro self-expanding stent (ses) was noted to be fractured.The device remains implanted.No other information was reported.The device was not returned for analysis.Two x-ray images were provided for analysis.In both images the stent is noted to be fractured.A product history record (phr) review of lot 17396206 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The phr review does not suggest that the event reported by the customer could be related to the manufacturing process.The reported ¿stent-ses- fractured - in patient¿ was confirmed via case image review.However, the exact cause of the damages found on device could not be conclusively determined.Procedural and handling factors may have contributed to the damages found.Because of the different nature of the joints in the neck, it is possible that significant rotational stress is put on a carotid stent as a result of movement around the atlantoaxial pivot joint as well of flexion/extension stresses by movements of the cervical vertebral joints.It can also further be deduced that because the range of neck movement is greater than the femoropopliteal segment, the forces on a given stent segment would be greater.Another important risk factor, previously not given much consideration, for stent fracture is the internal stress caused by pulsatile flow.This is thought to be higher at sites near pulsatile structures such as the heart and great vessels, and the carotid artery would certainly fit into this category.Limitations in both the flexibility and torsion of the stent will influence the long-term performance of carotid artery stenting.Per the instructions for use, which is not intended as a mitigation, ¿if resistance is met during delivery system introduction, the system should be withdrawn, and another system used.Fractures of this stent may occur.The causes and clinical implications of stent fractures are not well characterized.Care should be taken when deploying the stent as excessive force could, in rare instances, lead to stent deformation and/or fracture.¿ neither the phr review nor the case image review suggests that the reported event could be related to the manufacturing process of the unit.Therefore, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|