An analysis was performed on the returned lead portions and the electrodes were not returned for analysis.Therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During the visual analysis of the returned 164mm portion quadfilar coil 1 appeared to be broken.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the connector end of the quadfilar coil 1 coil break and identified the as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage and no pitting.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the electrode (mating) end of the quadfilar coil 1 coil break and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with residual material.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution.What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations.With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
|