Catalog Number 8065977763 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Scratched Material (3020); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 07/11/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product was returned for analysis.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Results from the product history record review indicated the product met release criteria.There has been one other complaint reported in the lot number.Additional information was requested.A questionnaire was received.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A technician reported that a cartridge split.The event occurred prior to the iol touching the eye.A questionnaire was received form the technician who reported there was resistance during implantation and the iol was scratched.There was no patient harm.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The cartridge was returned.Only a small amount of solution was observed dried in the cartridge.The tip has heavy stress lines prior to parting line and on the tip.An aneurysm is noted at the parting line which has torn/split completely along the posterior right side.The cartridge was cleaned for further evaluation.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.The associated lens was returned.Viscoelastic was observed on the lens.One haptic is broken at the gusset area (returned) and broken in the distal area (returned adhered to the optic surface).The optic is folded (broken) along one side with additional split/cracked damaged areas.The split/cracked damage may have been interpreted as the reported complaint of scratch.Cartridge product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.A qualified lens was used with the cartridge.The iol product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.The customer indicated the use of a qualified handpiece and viscoelastics.The reported tip damage was observed in the cartridge.There was no scratched lens damage observed.Other lens damage was observed, which may have been interpreted as the reported complaint of scratch.The root cause of the complaint may be related to a failure to follow the dfu.An inadequate amount of viscoelastic was observed in the cartridge.The observed tip damage typically occurs if there is an inadequate amount of viscoelastic between the lens and the cartridge lumen or if the lens is not positioned correctly.In addition, if the handpiece plunger is not positioned at the trailing optic edge it can allow the lens to fold around the plunger tip making it too large to correctly advance through the narrow tip of the cartridge, which could cause damage to the tip or the lens.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|