• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK XIENCE
Device Problem Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/25/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The stent remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The nc trek referenced is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately calcified ostial right coronary artery.A 4.0x8mm xience stent was implanted, but after post-dilatation with a 4.5 nc balloon, there was suboptimal expansion at the ostium.Additional post-dilatation was done with a 5.0x8mm nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) with one inflation at 18 atmospheres.During removal of the bdc, resistance was noted as the device would not retract into the guide catheter (gc).The balloon detached from the delivery catheter.It was thought that the balloon did not fully deflate.Another attempt was made to remove the bdc, but resistance remained.The bdc was pulled into the gc and the shaft separated inside the gc.The guide wire, bdc, and the guide catheter were removed as a single unit out of the patient, successfully.Once out of the anatomy, the bdc shaft was noted stuck inside the 6 (b)(6) sheath with portions of the shaft coming out.The bdc shaft was pulled out of the sheath post-procedure.In the physicians opinion, the balloon did not deflate entirely prior to the attempt to remove it from the anatomy, causing it to pull out of the gc.The procedure was completed successfully.There was no reported adverse patient effect or a clinically significant delay in the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Unique device identifier (udi): the udi is unknown because the part number and lot number were not provided.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot number were not provided.The investigation determined a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7802021
MDR Text Key117834833
Report Number2024168-2018-06426
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P070015
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK XIENCE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/31/2018
Initial Date FDA Received08/21/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/24/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-