The investigation was carried out based on the available information and the analysis of the service log entries from the transmitted photo.The reported symptom could be understood.By analyzing the photo, two entries of m007 and m006 in context to the described symptom (ventilator was not working properly) were found.The m006 entry is logged when the airway pressure (paw) has gone very negative (less than -10mbar) during a ventilator operating mode.The device alarms for "pressure negative" if the measured paw is less than ¿6.5 mbar.The m007 event is logged when the pressure inside the ventilator cylinder drops below -15 mbar.As a precaution, the piston pressure controller stops the ventilator temporarily and the device alarms accordingly with ¿ventilator fail¿.In case the device shuts down automatic ventilation, the device will generate according alarms, as it was in this specific case.Monitoring and manual ventilation remains functional.It was reported as additional information that during use, a suction was used.This is, besides e.G.Patient activity, a possible root cause for this m006 entry.A possible root cause for the m007 entry is an issue with the valve that is located on the top of the ventilator and that can dose ambient air into the cylinder in case of insufficient fresh gas flow.It is possible that this valve sticks if the cleaning recommendations of the instructions for use are not followed.It was reported additionally that the ventilator cover of the involved device never has been cleaned.Further it was reported that the tidal volume was unstable vt, so 550ml were adjusted and 1100 measured.This symptom points to a sticking peep-valve placed inside the cosy.A strong sticking peep-valve can cause that two sequent-breathing-swings can add on each other so that the threshold of the peak pressure will detect just one breathing swing, instead of two.The fabius device is equipped with integrated volume-monitoring.During use, if the delivered minute volume is less than set, alarms will be generated depending on the alarm limits adjusted by the user.The number of similar cases is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.However, in the framework of continuous product improvement a design change of the peep valve placed inside the cosy has been started to prevent sticking which can cause the described issue.Dräger finally concludes that the device responded as specified upon the symptom; no patient consequences have reportedly occurred.
|