Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that her ins battery was almost dead, and her insurance would not approve the replacement because they said it was an ¿investigational device¿.The patient reported that the ins settings had been changed unexpectedly, which happened maybe two years ago.The patient stated when she went to airports she requested to be ¿wanded down¿.The patient went in for a checkup after this and the hcp asked her who changed the setting, the patient stated no one had, so the patient believed the electromagnetic interference (emi) from the wand may have changed the settings.The patient noted the ins kept turning itself off.The patient stated this started happening last year and had happened three times.The patient noted they just went back in and they had it turned back on again.The patient noted she was careful to avoid emi if possibly, so she was unsure why it was happening.The patient stated they planned to continue to work with the hcp and field staff regarding ins replacement.There were no further complications that have been reported as a result of this event.
|