(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).Visual and dimensional inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported difficulty removing was unable to be confirmed; however, the tip detachment was confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no indication of a lot specific issue.It should be noted that the supera instructions for use (ifu) instructs: following confirmed implantation of the supera stent, retract the thumb slide in a single motion to the starting position on the handle and rotate the system lock and deployment lock into the locked position, in line with the thumb slide.In this case, failing to retract the thumbslide and lock the system lock likely caused the reported difficulties.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the left superficial femoral artery with moderate calcification and chronic total occlusion.The vessel was prepared with a 5.0 x 200 mm armada 35 balloon catheter.Then a 6.0 x 150 mm supera self-expanding stent (sess) was deployed.The sess was removed with resistance.It was noted that during removal the system lock and the deployment lock were not rotated back to the locked position after returning the thumb slide back to starting position.Angiography was performed post-stent deployment and it was observed that the tip was embedded in the left peroneal artery.An attempt was made to retrieve the tip with a snare and ballooning, but failed.A decision was made to leave the tip embedded in the vessel, ending the procedure.Reportedly, it was suspected that the tip became detached during removal.There was no reported adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|