• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG AS UNIVATION XF FEMUR CEMENTED F2 LM; FEMUR IMPLANTS UNIVATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG AS UNIVATION XF FEMUR CEMENTED F2 LM; FEMUR IMPLANTS UNIVATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NO186Z
Device Problem Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Manufacturing site evaluation: pending further information.
 
Event Description
Patient revised on (b)(6) 2018.Additional information has been requested, but not yet received.No patient injury was reported.No delay in surgery was reported.Components in use listed as concomitant devices are: no166z, as univation xf tibia cemented t5 lm, batch # 52080219.Nl478, univation f meniscal comp.T3 rm/lm 8mm, batch # 51974137.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The components have been examined visually and microscopically with the digital microscope.A visual inspection took place of the femoral component and the tibial plateau.At the femoral component, bone cement can be found at the area of the condyle.At the tibial plateau, only little residues of the bone cement can be found.The device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked to all the available lot numbers.The device history file has been checked and found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.No similar incidents have been filed with products from these batches.Based on the information available it is hardly possible to determine a conclusion and the root cause for the mentioned failure.We assume that the failure is not product related.It could be possible that the failure is usage related.Due to lack of information it is hardly possible to determine a conclusion and root cause.There are no hints for a material problem.According to the quality standard and dhr files a material defect and production error can be excluded.It could be possible that there were problems with the cement technique.Some time ago an internal extensive bone cement test with another two complained devices was carried out in the laboratory of biomechanics with a specialist from the product management research.Due to the fact that the mentioned cement test achieved a positive result, we excluded a product or design related error.A capa was created.The current failure rate is outside the risk analysis, risk analysis has to be adjusted by r&d.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
We received a complaint about one no186z (as univation xf femur cemented f2 lm) from the memorial hospital in baltimore.There is no device available for investigation.Loosening of the implant 3 years postoperatively.The implantation date is 13 sept 2015 and the revision date is unknown.The consequences for the patient is post-operative medical intervention was neccessary for a revision surgery.In the batch review, the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all available lot numbers.The device history file has been checked and found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.No similar incidents have been filed with products from these batches.Based on the information, it is hardly possible to determine a conclusion and the root cause for the mentioned failure.We assume that the failure is not product related.It could be possible that the figure is usage related.Due to lack of information and the circumstance that we did not receive the devices for the investigationit is hardly possible to determine a conclusion and root cause.There are no hints for a materials problem.According to the quality standard and dhr files a materials defect and production error can be excluded.It could be possible that there were problems with the cement techniques.Potential sources of fault relating to the cement: the process time of the used cements was excedded, wrong temperature, unfavourable storage, the age of the cement and wrong handling with the cement.Some time ago an internal extensive bone cements test (adhesive tensile testing) with another two complained devices were carried out in the laboratory of biomechanic with a specialist from the product management and biomechanical research.Due to the fact that the mentioned cement test achieved a positive result, we exclude a product or design related error.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AS UNIVATION XF FEMUR CEMENTED F2 LM
Type of Device
FEMUR IMPLANTS UNIVATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
MDR Report Key7915181
MDR Text Key121912752
Report Number9610612-2018-00428
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K131167
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/27/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/01/2023
Device Model NumberNO186Z
Device Catalogue NumberNO186Z
Device Lot Number51986203
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date11/19/2018
Device Age51 MO
Date Manufacturer Received11/19/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NL478; NO166Z; NL478; NO166Z
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-