No known patient involvement.Exact date is unknown.The device was received, and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.Additionally, device history records review has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Additional narrative: dhr review was completed.Dhr review for part number 319.006.Synthes lot number: ft00291.Supplier lot number: ft00291.Release to warehouse date: 21-dec-2016.Manufactured by (b)(4).The raw material was confirmed to be correct per the specification with no (relevant) non-conformance noted.No ncrs were generated during production review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Customer quality conducted an investigation of the returned device.Us customer quality (cq) investigation flow: broken.Received device: depth gauge 319.006, lot ft00291.Visual inspection by cq of the returned device revealed the depth gauge¿s needle had broken off; the break occurred where the needle threads into the slider: the needle broke flush with the slider.A portion of the needle remained in the slider and could not be disassembled.The remaining portion of the needle was not returned.Based on visual inspection, the received condition of the device agreed with the complaint description.The complaint condition of broken was confirmed.No other damage was noted to the device.Dimensional inspection could not be performed due to the received condition of the device.The following drawings were reviewed: top level depth gauge drawing; needle.During the investigation no product design issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product including the materials and its properties, which would contribute to this complaint condition.The complaint condition was confirmed.There were no issues during the manufacture of this product, including its material properties, that would contribute to this complaint condition.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the device experienced abnormal or excessive forces during handling/use.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|