(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The udi is unknown because the part number and lot number were not provided.Date of implant has been estimated.The device was not returned for analysis.The lot history record (lhr) for this product could not be reviewed and a similar incident query could not be performed because the product was not returned for evaluation and the part and lot numbers were not reported.The investigation determined the reported difficulties were due to operational context.The reported difficulties occurred due to the suture of the proglide device inadvertently capturing the previously implanted supera stent.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that an arteriotomy closure of the mildly calcified left common femoral artery was attempted using a proglide device with a 6f sheath after an interventional iliac stenting procedure.Reportedly, the suture of the proglide device captured a previously implanted supera stent.When the suture was pulled, the supera stent moved into the tissue tract.The proglide device and suture were removed.The patient was taken to surgery and a cutdown was performed and the extravascular portion of the stent was removed.Hemostasis was achieved by surgical suturing.A blood transfusion was given.There was a clinically significant delay in the procedure or therapy.Hospitalization was extended.No additional information was provided.
|