• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 310_MOSAIC
Device Problems Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Corneal Pannus (1447); Hematoma (1884); Mitral Regurgitation (1964); Thrombus (2101); Regurgitation (2259)
Event Date 09/07/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.A supplemental report will be filed upon completion of the device evalua tion.No unique device identifier (model/serial) was provided.The model and catalog number in section d.4.Was arbitrarily chosen based on the available information provided.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 14 years and 1 month post implant of this mitral bioprosthetic valve of unknown size, it was explanted due to regurgitation.The valve was replaced with a 27mm valve.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, visual inspection identified damage along the sewing ring of the valve, likely caused during the explant procedure.The valve was slightly distorted (oval shaped).All leaflets were in the closed position with wavy free margins.All leaflets were flexible except on areas where pannus was observed.From the outflow view, tan thrombotic host tissue was observed along the margin of attachment of the left cusp (lc).Tear abrasion through the lunula of the right cusp (rc) was consistent with contact with the bias cloth.A smaller abrasion, approximately 1mm, was also noted on the lunula of the rc.From the inflow view, the left cusp (lc) exhibited an intracuspal hematoma along the margin of attachment, extending onto the inferior coaptive area between the lc and rc.Due to the dehisced right non-coronary commissure, the rc was prolapsed.The right non-coronary commissure was dehisced.The detachment was noted at the superior coaptive area.The detachment did not expose the aortic wall; therefore, manufacturing sutures could not be assessed.The right non-coronary commissure and left non-coronary commissure were intact, with no commissure dehiscence noted.White pannus encroached up to 9mm of the non-coronary cusp (inflow).A layer of white pannus lined the outflow rail adjacent to the nc and lc cusps, extending onto the back of the left non-coronary stent post.White pannus was noted on the back of the left right commissure stent post.An unknown amount of pannus appears to have been removed during explant.Radiography showed no evidence of calcification on the leaflets.Conclusion: based on the product analysis, pannus overgrowth covering the commissure/stent post could create additional stress during valve closure by limiting the deflection of the stent posts.For this event, pannus overgrowth may be a contributing factor to the commissure dehiscence.The right non-coronary commissure dehiscence may have caused the right cusp prolapse and led to incomplete coaptation, causing the regurgitation.The distortion of the annular ring (oval shape) may have altered the stress placed on the commissures and leaflets of the valve.The alteration of stress may have played a role in dehiscence of the commissure.Commissure dehiscence is a known risk is for valve failure.Reduced performance of the valve is attributed to host tissue overgrowth.This finding is generally considered a patient-related condition.Updated codes in section.Updated serial number and expiration date in section.Updated device manufacture date in section.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for follow-up on report number 2025587-2018-02612, follow-up 001, was due to device evaluation.The follow-up type was corrected to 'device evaluation'.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added expiration date, added device manufacture date.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key7926776
MDR Text Key122360088
Report Number2025587-2018-02612
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/16/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/24/2007
Device Model Number310_MOSAIC
Device Catalogue Number310_MOSAIC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/14/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/14/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured03/24/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-