As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.Since neither the underlying medical documents nor device part details were received for investigation no thorough medical investigation, manufacturing record review and assessment of the reported event can be performed.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Without additional information about this patient¿s particular case, our investigation remains inconclusive.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr head was removed.The bhr cup remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr head and cup was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.No further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported elevated metal ion levels, pain, and granulomatosis-type changes noted intraoperatively are consistent with an adverse reaction to metal debris; however, without the supporting lab/pathology results, imaging, and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the source cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.Also, without the implantation and pre-revision x-rays to determine initial implant anatomical placement and any micro-motion over time (for loosening), this cannot be ruled out as a contributory factor to the reported clinical reactions.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|