Catalog Number 8065990941 |
Device Problem
Suction Problem (2170)
|
Patient Problem
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 09/13/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Manufacturing record reviewed.No abnormalities that could have contributed to this event were found.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A physician reported when performing a lasik procedure on a patient's left eye, suction was interrupted involuntarily in the middle of the procedure.This left only the middle of the corneal bed dissected.The beginning of the side cut was not reached.Surgery was suspended and physician is waiting to evaluate.Upon follow up, the surgery was aborted.The patient had an incomplete flap.Vision was reported to be the same as the day before the procedure.Only one part of the procedure was performed.Therefore, there is a need to wait to plan for a new surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information provided.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received.Surgery has been completed satisfactorily on the eye that loss suction in the middle of the treatment.A new deeper flap was programmed and the hinge was positioned in a different place from the first surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Risk is considered to be reduced as far as possible.Reviewing risk analysis concludes that no serious deterioration in state of health or death can be caused by the reported event.To the current knowledge and based on the risk analysis, there is no indication for a product problem which (might have) caused or contributed to a serious deterioration in state of health or death.The root cause could not be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information provided in h.3., h.6., and h.10.The risk is considered to be reduced as far as possible.Risk analysis was reviewed and it can be concluded that no serious deterioration in state of health or death could be caused by the reported event.To the current knowledge and based on the risk analysis, there is no indication for a product problem which (might have) caused or contributed to a serious deterioration in state of health or death.A logfile review for the whole day was performed.The review of logfile showed at system startup, no error messages or parameter deviations could be seen from the log file which points to the problem described.The three system test for vacuum, energy and ablation was executed by the user without any problems.Logfile review showed one treatment aborted after the warning message during bed cut.The message indicated that the user released laser pedals and pressed the right footswitch to turn off the vacuum.The user did not restart the treatment.The root cause could be determined as user handling.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|