|
Model Number FEM10100 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Misfire (2532)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 09/18/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a manufacturing review will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent graft deployment procedure for treatment of venous anastomosis of a ptfe graft to the basilic vein using a bareback method, the stent graft allegedly partially deployed.It was further reported that the delivery system was allegedly broken.Reportedly, another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent graft deployment procedure for treatment of venous anastomosis of a ptfe graft to the basilic vein using a bareback method, the stent graft allegedly partially deployed.It was further reported that the delivery system was allegedly broken.Reportedly, another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: based on the information available and the investigation performed, there is no indication that the product failed to meet its specification prior to shipment.The lot records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.The review shows that no remarkable incidents occurred during the manufacturing process.No relevant manufacturing process changes were implemented, that could have led to the event reported.Investigation summary: as part of all complaint investigations, an attempt was made to evaluate the subject device as well as the device usage.In this particular case no sample and no images were provided for evaluation.Therefore, the reported problem could not be reproduced and the investigation will be closed with inconclusive result.Based on the information available and as no sample was returned, a definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risks.Regarding preparation of the device the ifu states that 'prior to loading the endovascular system over a guide wire, both ports must be flushed with sterile saline (.).Flushing these lumens will also facilitate stent graft deployment.' regarding the anatomy of the placement site the ifu states: 'the safety and effectiveness of the device when placed across a tight bend (.) has not been evaluated.Prior to stent graft deployment, ensure that the proximal (inflow) stent graft end is positioned in a straight section of the lumen to reduce the risk of higher deployment forces and possible endovascular system failure' furthermore, the ifu states: 'if unusual resistance or high deployment force is encountered during stent graft deployment, abort the procedure, remove the delivery system and use an alternative device.' under 'materials required' the ifu states 'introducer sheath with appropriate inner diameter'.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|