• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION DYNAGEN X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION DYNAGEN X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number G156
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581); Ambient Noise Problem (2877); Device Sensing Problem (2917)
Patient Problems No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/11/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific received information that noise was noted on the right ventricular (rv) and shock channels of this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d).Rv oversensing of the noise led to pacing inhibition lasting longer than two seconds.Device sensing was adjusted which appeared to resolve the issue.It was later reported that rv lead amplitudes were out of range.Boston scientific technical services (ts) discussed that this could be due to premature ventricular contractions (pvcs).Ts discussed programming optimization options.No adverse patient effects were reported.This device remains in service.
 
Event Description
Additional information was reported indicating that the non-boston scientific (bsc) right ventricular (rv) lead started having noise in october 2017.The rv lead was later abandoned surgically and replaced; however, the new rv lead was placed in an area of the heart that was developing exit block.The non-bsc lead was then uncapped and used as the pace/sense portion, and a new high voltage lead was implanted.It was originally thought that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was the cause to the noise oversensing and pacing inhibition.The non-bsc rv lead was still having pauses, despite programming changes and was planned to be revised.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This product remains in service.This report will be updated, should additional information be received.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific received information that noise was noted on the right ventricular (rv) lead.Oversensing of the noise led to pacing inhibition lasting longer than two seconds.Device sensing was adjusted which appeared to resolve the issue.It was later reported that rv amplitudes were out of range.Technical services discussed that this could be due to premature ventricular contractions.Technical services discussed programming optimization options.No adverse patient effects were reported.This product remains in service.Additional information was reported indicating that the non-boston scientific (bsc) right ventricular (rv) lead started having noise in (b)(6) 2017.It was originally thought that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was the cause to the noise oversensing and pacing inhibition.The non-bsc rv lead was later abandoned surgically and replaced; however, the new rv lead was placed in an area of the heart that was developing exit block.The non-bsc lead was then uncapped and used as the pace/sense portion, and a new high voltage lead was implanted.The non-bsc rv lead was still having pauses, despite programming changes and was planned to be revised.No adverse patient effects were reported.This crt-d remains in service.This report will be updated, should additional information be received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the defibrillation, pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DYNAGEN X4 CRT-D
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key7981650
MDR Text Key124267322
Report Number2124215-2018-17935
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier00802526534669
UDI-Public00802526534669
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010012/S341
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/18/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/06/2018
Device Model NumberG156
Device Catalogue NumberG156
Device Lot Number374823
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
0181.; 0293.; 4674.; G148.; G156.; MISMATCH.
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-