Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/04/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was noted at the generator replacement surgery that high impedance was also found and a lead revision surgery was performed as a result.Troubleshooting steps during the surgery were offered to the surgeon, however the surgeon declined troubleshooting and decided to replace the lead prophylactically as it was believed that the new leads "were better made and the old leads are flimsy".It was further confirmed that the impedance was within normal limits pre-operatively.The devices were shipped back for analysis, however no devices were received to date.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
The explanted devices were returned for analysis.Analysis of the generator was performed and found no anomalies.The device performed according to functional specifications.Review of the device's internal data noted an impedance change from impedance within normal limits to high impedance detected to have occurred on the date of explant.No other anomalies were noted.The lead assembly was returned in one portion.It is noted that a portion of the lead assembly including the electrodes and tie downs was not returned.Setscrew marks were observed on the connector pin, providing evidence of a proper mechanical contact between conductive surfaces of both the generator and connector pin.Abraded openings were noted of the inner and outer silicone tubing.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, and no discontinuities were noted in the portion of the lead returned, and therefore could not confirm a fracture.No other anomalies were noted.No additional relevant information was received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Tablet data was received providing further programming history from the patient's pre-replacement and post-replacement devices.Programming history was reviewed for the patient's previous device and noted that the last diagnostics observed were from 2012 indicating that the device was functioning as intended with no apparent malfunctions.Programming history was reviewed for the patient's replacement device and noted that high impedance was observed upon first interrogation and system diagnostic.Subsequent diagnostics performed about two hours after the high impedance was seen indicated that the device was functioning within normal limits.No further information was received to date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|