• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGICAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Fistula (1862); Incontinence (1928); Pain (1994); Not Applicable (3189)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article, therefore no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon product (tension-free vaginal tape) involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon product involved? citation: can urol assoc j 2013; 7(9-10):e598-600.Doi: http://dx.Doi.Org/10.5489/cuaj.393.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: "title: a severe complication of mid-urethral tapes solved by laparoscopic tape removal and ureterocutaneostomy" author(s): tobias schätz, md; stephan hruby, md; daniela colleselli, md; günter janetschek, md; lukas lusuardi, md citation: can urol assoc j 2013; 7(9-10):e598-600.Doi: http://dx.Doi.Org/10.5489/cuaj.393.This study presented an (b)(6) female patient who underwent tension-free vaginal tape (tvt, gynecare) procedure for persistent stress urinary incontinence.In (b)(6) 2010, she presented with perineal pain, continuous incontinence and offensive smelling.Urine culture was positive for e.Coli and cystoscopy revealed small mid-urethral stone adherent to the eroded tape in the 6-o¿clock position.Vaginal examination revealed presence of vaginal fistula.The urethral stone was totally removed with cold cup biopsy forceps and the underlying tape was divided and partially removed.There was an unsuccessful attempt to remove the eroded tape from the lateral sides of the bladder neck and a suprapubic catheter was inserted.Cystography confirmed the urethro-vaginal fistula.Post-treatment, the patient developed pain and swelling of the mons pubis which a 6cm fluid was found on ct scan.She was still incontinent and in pain.She underwent removal of the tape and perform bilateral uretrocutaneostomy using minimally invasive techniques.Laparoscopic surgery to remove the tape was safe and efficacious in this unfortunate scenario.Laparoscopy can also provide an effective solution for incontinence in an elderly, comorbid patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON SARL-NEUCHATEL
puits-godet 20
neuchatel
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key8043833
MDR Text Key126371194
Report Number2210968-2018-76990
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
K974098
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/06/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/22/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
-
-