Catalog Number S-50-120-120-P6 |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Material Separation (1562); Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
|
Event Date 10/18/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the supera stent delivery system was advanced to the superficial femoral artery, heavily calcified lesion without issue.During deployment, the stent partially deployed, however, further stent deployment was not possible.The thumbslide was advanced but no further stent deployment was noted.As troubleshooting, the system was locked and unlocked but nothing would allow for further deployment.As treatment, a contralateral access site was gained and a snare was advanced to the partially deployed stent.While all was removed as a single unit, difficulty was encountered and a shaft separation was observed.All was removed from the patient's anatomy and a non-abbott device was used in replacement.There was a clinically significant delay as bleeding from both access sites was now noted and pressure had to be held to obtain hemostasis.The event resolved and the patient is in stable condition.No additional information was provided regarding this issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The deployment difficulty was unable to be confirmed as the stent had already been deployed.The entrapment in the vessel was unable to be confirmed as it was based on case circumstances.The shaft detachment was confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.It should be noted that hematoma or hemorrhagic event, with or without surgical repair is listed in the supera instruction for use (ifu) as a potential adverse event associated with the use of the device.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported deployment issue.The tip separation, shaft separation and subsequent patient effects were likely due to case circumstances.It may be possible that the distal shaft was entrapped or restricted within the anatomy such that the ratchet efficiency was compromised and was unable to fully release the stent.However, this could not be confirmed.Additionally, withdrawing the delivery system into the introducer sheath with a partially deployed stent likely caused the tip and proximal shaft to detach when the withdrawal forces of pulling the partially deployed stent through the reduced clearance of the introducer sheath exceeded the tensile strength of the tip lumen and causing the shaft to pull out from the coupler to distal end cap (dec).Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|