• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 4; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 4; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180614
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Injury (2348)
Event Date 09/11/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Not returned.
 
Event Description
Patient called stating she had a right hip replacement 6 years ago.She stated her implant broke inside and had to be revised on (b)(6) 2018.
 
Event Description
Patient called stating she had a right hip replacement 6 years ago.She stated her implant broke inside and had to be revised on (b)(6) 2018.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding crack/fracture involving a mako baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Through clinician review of the surgical protocol.Method & results: product evaluation and results: not performed as no product was returned for evaluation.No photographs were provided for review.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: there are no medical records, x-rays or explant photographs available for the explanted mako device during revision on sep 11, 2018.A fracture of the central portion of the mako tibial baseplate was confirmed in the revision surgical report and as such confirmed although no description of any possible cause was mentioned.The knee was converted to a competitor knee device with short tibial stem extender.Because there are only x-rays post revision after implantation of the competitor knee and no x-rays prior to revision, nor medical records or explant photographs, the cause of failure remains obscure due to lack of relevant information.X-rays of the mako post implantation and post event would be required to help solve this case.Product history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: there are no medical records, x-rays or explant photographs available for the explanted mako device during revision on sep 11, 2018.A fracture of the central portion of the mako tibial baseplate was confirmed in the revision surgical report and as such confirmed although no description of any possible cause was mentioned.The knee was converted to a competitor knee device with short tibial stem extender.Because there are only x-rays post revision after implantation of the competitor knee and no x-rays prior to revision, nor medical records or explant photographs, the cause of failure remains obscure due to lack of relevant information.X-rays of the mako post implantation and post event would be required to help solve this case.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as device return, pre and post operative x-rays, operative reports as well as patient history and follow up notes are required to complete the investigation for determining a root cause.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.The initial event reported an unknown stryker knee.Additional information provided identifies the fractured device as a mako baseplate.Mako devices are reported under registration 3005985723, the registration number cannot be changed, however the legal manufacturer and manufacturing sites have been updated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 4
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key8066044
MDR Text Key127057070
Report Number0002249697-2018-03716
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number180614
Device Lot Number26440611-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/23/2018
Initial Date FDA Received11/13/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/01/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/29/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient Weight107
-
-