An event regarding crack/fracture involving a mako baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Through clinician review of the surgical protocol.Method & results: product evaluation and results: not performed as no product was returned for evaluation.No photographs were provided for review.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: there are no medical records, x-rays or explant photographs available for the explanted mako device during revision on sep 11, 2018.A fracture of the central portion of the mako tibial baseplate was confirmed in the revision surgical report and as such confirmed although no description of any possible cause was mentioned.The knee was converted to a competitor knee device with short tibial stem extender.Because there are only x-rays post revision after implantation of the competitor knee and no x-rays prior to revision, nor medical records or explant photographs, the cause of failure remains obscure due to lack of relevant information.X-rays of the mako post implantation and post event would be required to help solve this case.Product history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: there are no medical records, x-rays or explant photographs available for the explanted mako device during revision on sep 11, 2018.A fracture of the central portion of the mako tibial baseplate was confirmed in the revision surgical report and as such confirmed although no description of any possible cause was mentioned.The knee was converted to a competitor knee device with short tibial stem extender.Because there are only x-rays post revision after implantation of the competitor knee and no x-rays prior to revision, nor medical records or explant photographs, the cause of failure remains obscure due to lack of relevant information.X-rays of the mako post implantation and post event would be required to help solve this case.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as device return, pre and post operative x-rays, operative reports as well as patient history and follow up notes are required to complete the investigation for determining a root cause.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.The initial event reported an unknown stryker knee.Additional information provided identifies the fractured device as a mako baseplate.Mako devices are reported under registration 3005985723, the registration number cannot be changed, however the legal manufacturer and manufacturing sites have been updated.
|