On (b)(6) 2018, two gore® tigris® vascular stent¿s were implanted within the left popliteal artery.It was reported to gore that on (b)(6) 2018, the gore medical devices were explanted during a left transfemoral amputation because of the bad evolution of the left lower limb.
|
Results code 213: a review of the manufacturing records indicated the lots met pre-release specifications.The gore® tigris® vascular stent was returned to geprovas, independent laboratory, for investigation.The scope and results of the investigation were summarized and a report was submitted to w.L.Gore & associates.An explant investigator (ei) at w.L.Gore & associates reviewed the report.The following is a summary of the ei observations: tissue present: yes device is fully encapsulated in white to yellow biologic tissue.The lumen is obstructed with dark red/brown biologic material.Device patency could not be determined with the information provided.The specimen containing the devices retained a ¿j¿ shape.Request for additional analysis: yes reason: level 2 analysis was requested from geprovas but could not be provided.The device was sent to cvpath institute for mct and histological analysis as part of a study.As information revealed that another gore® tigris® vascular stent was involved in the medical device incident, the second gore device will be also reported to the fda under the mfr report #2017233-2018-00692.
|
The gore® tigris® vascular stent was returned to geprovas, independent laboratory, for investigation.Additional analysis revealed new findings.The scope and results of the investigation were summarized and a report was submitted to w.L.Gore & associates.An explant investigator (ei) at w.L.Gore & associates reviewed the report.Tissue present: yes devices are fully encapsulated in white to yellow biologic tissue.The lumens are obstructed with dark red/brown biologic material.Device patency could not be determined with the information provided.The specimen containing the devices retained a ¿j¿ shape.Review of the level 2 analysis, showed the devices were deployed in a dissected artery; arterial tissue pathology was consistent with atherosclerotic disease.In addition, due to the short implant duration, healing could not be assessed.Request for additional analysis: no reason: level 2 analysis was requested from geprovas and a complimentary report was provided summarizing the cvpath results.Based on the ei's review of the level 1 and 2 geprovas reports, no additional analysis is requested.As information revealed that another gore® tigris® vascular stent was involved in the medical device incident, the second gore device will be also reported to the fda under the mfr report #2017233-2018-00692.Initially this incident was reported under mfr report #2017233-2018-00693.
|