The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of catheter malposition was inconclusive because no sample was returned to vad for evaluation.Based on the description of the reported event, possible contributing factors include anatomical features and changes in thoracic pressure; however, the lack of a returned sample prevented both confirmation of the reported event and identification of a root cause(s).Consequently, this complaint is inconclusive at this time.A lot history review (lhr) of recu0224 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number have been reported from the same facility.
|
Per ms&s: the line was placed on (b)(6) 2018, the next morning on (b)(6) 2018, an x-ray was performed and it was determined that the powerpicc solo had malposition (reference file # (b)(4)).On (b)(6) 2018, the line malpositioned one more time, the line was pulled out to the point of a midline placement.There has not been any other issues with the catheter was a midline.
|