At a generator replacement planned due to low battery, it was reported that high impedance was detected preoperatively, replacement of the generator did not resolve the high impedance, so the lead was replaced.The surgeon noted fluid in the leads, and when the patient's neck incision site was opened, it was found that there was a break in the lead at the electrodes.The suspect product was received but analysis has not been completed on the device to date.No further relevant information has been received to date.
|
Product analysis was completed on the returned generator.As received, the generator was at end of service condition.Per functional and electrical tests, the generator performed as expected with no anomalies identified.Product analysis was completed on the returned lead.Product analysis identified six abraded openings in the outer tubing along the lead body.There was one abraded opening in both the outer and inner tubing.Body fluids were located in the inner and outer tubing in some places.Four lead fractures were identified.At the fracture closest to the connector pin, microscopic an abraded opening was identified.The inner and outer abraded opening was located near the middle fractures, which were located right next to each other.Pitting was identified at the two middle fractures.Of the fracture types that could be identified, there was evidence of stress induced fractures, both rotational and fatigue types.Due to the presence of pitting at some of the fracture sites, it is believed that stimulation was present for some amount of time after the fracture with the exception of the observed abraded openings (outer and inner tubes) and discontinuities the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.No further relevant information has been received to date.
|