• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS, INC SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR; CEMENT OBTURATOR, PRODUCT CODE: LZN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS, INC SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR; CEMENT OBTURATOR, PRODUCT CODE: LZN Back to Search Results
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Osteolysis (2377)
Event Date 08/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Radiographs were provided for review images received did not detect osteolysis at the proximal end of the prosthetic shaft.A medical review of the radiograph notes, what is noted as osteolysis is most likely radio residual cement plug.If anything the femoral cortical bin looks almost normal.Less than normal cement distal to femoral stem.The plug would not play a significant role in the fracture.Looks like the fracture occurred proximal to the plug, at the end of the cement mantel.Root cause analysis: within in medical probability, at 11 years, the synplug did not cause or contribute to the femur fracture, left.Though the 11 year post-operative event was alleged to involve synplug, to date, there are no conclusive findings from this or similar complaint investigations, or from technical or clinical information in the literature that proves or disproves a causal relationship between synplug® & optiplug® biodegradable cement restrictors or the materials they are manufactured with, and periprosthetic osteolysis (or fractures as a result).There are also no data or findings that would suggest that only some subset of all the products manufactured might be affected.A risk/benefit analysis of two reported fractured, 58 reported osteolysis without the need for medical intervention and 100,000+ patients benefiting from a successful surgery it can be concluded that the benefit outweighs the risk.The finding of osteolysis surrounding the distal cement restrictor is unexpected, and undesirable; however, periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty is a well-known problem that is typically a multifactorial process and may be identified through routine radiographic follow-up.
 
Event Description
Initial hip replacement (hip arthroplasty) surgery involving a hip prosthesis, with weber straight shaft ss, fitmore cup size 52, durasul inlay size 32, cobalt chrome head size 32 medium, palacos cement, synplug cement restrictor size 1, left side occurred (b)(6) 2007.A fracture on left side required surgery on (b)(6) 2018.Surgery consisted of open, reposition and compound osteosynthesis of left femur with palacos cement and ncb plate, left femur, on (b)(6) 2018.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR
Type of Device
CEMENT OBTURATOR, PRODUCT CODE: LZN
Manufacturer (Section D)
ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS, INC
irvine CA 96218
Manufacturer Contact
aaron
5770 armada drive
carlsbad, CA 92008
MDR Report Key8087218
MDR Text Key127851116
Report Number2090010-2018-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSW
PMA/PMN Number
KO10840
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/19/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/20/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
-
-