A complete investigation was not able to be performed as no product code, lot number or sample was provided.Per the study, proposed potential benefits attributable to the minimally invasive nature of pevar while demonstrating cost-effectiveness despite the additional cost f closure devices.[(b)(4)].
|
Received an article titled "successful percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair is significantly cheaper than femoral cutdown in a prospective randomized trial" published in the journal of vascular surgery.The article compared percutaneous femoral access for endovascular aneurysm repair (pevar) with surgical cutdown for femoral access (cevar).Per the article, adverse events included pain, aneurysm rupture, cardiac arrest, blood loss, occlusion and hematoma.
|