Pc-(b)(4).Batch # r92l6e.Additional information was requested: attempts are being made to obtain the following information: did the patient experience any adverse consequences due to this issue? to date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Investigation summary: the analysis results found that the device was received with the tissue pad detached and not returned but with evidence of body fluids and tissue pad material in the groove section of the clamp arm.The device was connected to a test hand piece and a gen11 and the device did activate during functional testing.No noise issues were noted at any time during the analysis of the device.The device was disassembled to inspect the internal components and no anomalies were found.Based on the condition of the tissue pad, a probable cause for this damage is that the clamp of the device may have been closed and the instrument activated without tissue present.Care should be taken not to apply pressure between the instrument blade and tissue pad without having tissue between them.Keep the clamp arm open when back cutting or while the blade is active without tissue between the blade and tissue pad to avoid damage to the tissue pad.The resulting damage contributes to the removal of the pad from the clamp arm.The cleaning of the pad, not in accordance with the ifu, can also result in removal of the pad during use.The batch history record was reviewed and no defects, ncr¿s or protocols related to the complaint, were found during the manufacturing process.
|
It was reported that at the beginning of the laparoscopic rectosigmoidectomy surgery, a strange (metallic) noise was observed in the operation of the tweezers, and it was observed that the white coating of the tip had loosened.It was collected and new tweezers were requested to continue the surgery.Patient consequence is unknown.
|