• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Energy Output Problem (1431); Overheating of Device (1437); Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problems Aspiration/Inhalation (1725); Cardiopulmonary Arrest (1765); Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Burning Sensation (2146); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Coma (2417)
Event Date 11/02/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for spinal pain.It was reported that the battery site had a burning sensation from the inside out.When stimulation was on or the ins was recharging the patient had a severe burning pain.It was reported that the consumer probably dismissed any of the symptoms until almost a week to a week and a half ago.It was hard to sit down and lean against somethings.3-4 days ago it got to the patient that the patient could not sleep on it, it was swollen, and was extremely hard.The consumer was concerned because there was some haste with installation trouble.When in surgery the patient aspirated into lungs and coded.They had to be transferred and was in a coma for 5 days.There were in the middle of the procedure when this happened so the patient was concerned and questioned if everything got installed properly.The stimulation had been turned on (b)(6) 2018.The surgical site on their back formed a large bump which subsided when stimulation was turned off.It started out mild and was now about the size of a jawbreaker.Last night ((b)(6) 2018) they turned stimulation off for 6-7 hours and it went down significantly.The morning of the report the consumer charged and they were back to the burning sensation.The consumer had been playing around with the settings and had it on the lower side for the last couple of days.No further complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key8135114
MDR Text Key129434837
Report Number3004209178-2018-26966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/05/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2019
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/03/2018
Date Device Manufactured10/02/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age43 YR
-
-