Product analysis was completed for the returned generators and on the returned lead.Note that since the electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present between the lead and a generator.Product analysis observed an abraded opening in the outer and inner lead tubing that exposed the conductive coil.An additional abraded opening in only the outer tubing was also identified.The lead assembly had dried remnants of what appear to have once been body fluids inside the inner and outer silicone tubing.No obvious point of entrance was noted other than the identified tubing openings and the end of the returned lead portion no other anomalies were identified.Product analysis was completed on the explanted generator that was returned due to near end of service battery depletion.The generator performed as expected with no failures identified.Per the internal data of the device, there was no evidence of high impedance, indicating that the high impedance occurred after the battery became depleted or after generator replacement occurred.Product analysis was completed on the generator that was opened but not used, due to lead compatibility, and there were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.High impedance was detected on the generator on the day the generator was opened but not used as expected.No further relevant information has been received to date.
|