It was reported that the stent fractured.The patient was enrolled in the (b)(6) study on (b)(6) 2016 and the index procedure was performed on the same day.The target lesion was located in the right mid superficial femoral artery (sfa) with 85% stenosis and was 120mm long with a proximal reference vessel diameter of 6.00mm and distal vessel diameter of 6.00mm and was classified as tasc iib lesion.The lesion was treated with pre-dilatation and placement of a 6mm x 150mm study stent with 5% residual stenosis.Following post-dilatation, residual stenosis was 5%.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient was discharged on dual antiplatelet medication.On (b)(6) 2018, during the 2 year follow up, an x-ray was performed which revealed a stent fracture in the study stent deployed in the right mid sfa.The device deficiency did not lead to a serious adverse event.
|
It was reported that the stent fractured.The patient was enrolled in the imperial study on (b)(6) 2016 and the index procedure was performed on the same day.The target lesion was located in the right mid superficial femoral artery (sfa) with 85% stenosis and was 120mm long with a proximal reference vessel diameter of 6.00mm and distal vessel diameter of 6.00mm and was classified as tasc iib lesion.The lesion was treated with pre-dilatation and placement of a 6mm x 150mm study stent with 5% residual stenosis.Following post-dilatation, residual stenosis was 5%.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient was discharged on dual antiplatelet medication.On (b)(6) 2018, during the 2 year follow up, an x-ray was performed which revealed a stent fracture in the study stent deployed in the right mid sfa.The device deficiency did not lead to a serious adverse event.Additional information reported that during the 24 month follow up, dus core lab dated november 15, 2018, noted isr category as 50-99%.Additionally, dus core lab noted stent fracture at 6cm instent with flow documented between stent wall and artery.There is no further information available at this time.
|