Catalog Number RTLR180111 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Uremia (2188)
|
Event Date 11/27/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Clinical review: a clinical investigation was performed.A temporal relationship exists between ccpd therapy utilizing the liberty cycler and the event(s) of insufficient dialysis leading to uremia and pd catheter (not a fresenius product) evaluation, which warranted hospitalization.The pdrn¿s attributes the insufficient dialysis and uremia to liberty cycler issues.Based on the limited information available, the liberty cycler cannot be disassociated from the event.The liberty cycler manufacturer evaluation is pending at the time of this investigation.As such, the liberty cycler cannot be excluded from having a possible causal or contributory role in the event(s).Additional information was requested, however, to date not provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
A peritoneal dialysis patient reported being hospitalized on (b)(6) 2018.Upon follow-up, the pdrn stated that the patient visited the clinic as he had stopped draining on the 3rd cycler requiring manual exchanges.At the clinic, the catheter was power flushed with heparin when the solution went in fine but not coming out and the patient was advised to go to the hospital.The rn stated that the patient¿s labs were performed and their bun was between 48-88 indicating inadequate dialysis due to cycler issues.The patient is in the hospital where he was getting sufficient pd and his catheter was being evaluated and was scheduled for a reposition.Additionally, uremia is a part of disease complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|