An internal biomérieux investigation was initiated due to a customer report of a misidentification of corynebacterium pyruviciproducens as corynebacterium glucuronolyticum for a patient isolate (washed sperm sample) in association with the vitek® ms instrument.The vitek ms identified c.Glucuronolyticum, and the 16s sequencing result was c.Pyruviciproducens (98% with a 96% c.Glucuronolyticum).The customer data from the tests performed was provided and analyzed.Conclusion on the system: the system was not operating at system specifications during the tests: fine tuning was needed; the customer's calibrator spot preparation quality seemed to be good.The calibrator "all peaks" values are quite homogeneous during the tests.It could be extrapolated to the samples spots quality preparation.Conclusion on the identification: regarding the sequencing information, the expected identification is corynebacterium pyruviciproducens.It was confirmed by the analysis of the nucleotides sequence by r&d with smartgene (solutions to the management and analysis of genetic information, for clinical, medical research, veterinary, and industrial applications).The tested species is not included in the vitek ms knowledge base (kb) v3.0.The following system limitation is mentioned in the vitek ms knowledge base user manual ref.161150-556-b for vitek ms clinical use v3.0: "testing of species not found in the database may result in an unidentified result or a misidentification." it can be observed from the analysis of the 16s sequencing and the nucleotides sequence that both species, corynebacterium pyruviciproducens and corynebacterium glucuronolyticum, are very similar.This could explain the misidentification obtained.Suspected cause of the issue: system limitation, species not in the knowledge base v3.0.Note: the fine tuning was needed when the test was done; however, this is not retained as a cause of the issue because these two species are very close (98% for c.Pyruviciproducens and 96% for c.Glucuronolyticum based on sequencing report) and the expected organism is not present in the kb.Consequently, it is probable that this misidentification could occur with a properly fine-tuned system.
|