It was reported that an inaccurate pulmonary artery pressure (pap) value was indicated during use.Indicated pap reading was 30 mmhg although the expected value was 10 mmhg.The waveform was able to be confirmed.The customer was able to zero before the initial use but was unable to zero during use.The swan ganz catheter was exchanged and the problem was solved.The value after exchange of the catheter was ~ 15 mmhg.The edwards lifesciences disposable pressure transducer (dpt), from an unknown model number, was not considered suspect as the issue was solved when the catheter was exchanged using the same dpt.Patient demographic information requested but unavailable.There were no patient complications reported.
|
One catheter, model 777f8, with attached monoject 1.5 cc limited volume syringe was returned for evaluation.Without the return of the pressure monitoring unit, customer report of pressure measurement issue could not be confirmed.All through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.No visible damage or inconsistency to the catheter body, connectors, balloon or returned syringe was observed.The balloon inflated clear, concentric and remained inflated for more than 5 minutes without leakage.No fault messages appeared on the lab vigilance ii monitor when the catheter was connected.The thermistor was found to read 36.9 c when submerged into a 37.0 c water bath.The catheter ran cco in 37.0 c water bath on vigilance ii monitor for 5 minutes without error.The thermistor and thermal filament circuit were continuous, there were no open or intermittent conditions.No visible inconsistency was observed on eeprom data.Resistance value of the thermal filament circuit was within specification, measuring 38.43 ohms.Balloon inflation test was performed using returned syringe with 1.5 cc air.Visual examination was performed under microscope at 20x magnification and with the unaided eye.Customer report of pressure measurement issue could not be confirmed during evaluation.An investigation has been initiated to consider any potential manufacturing factors that may have contributed to this complaint and implement any necessary corrective actions.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.With any hemodynamic monitoring, patient parameters can change quickly and dramatically.Patient parameters should correlate with the patient¿s clinical manifestations.In this case it is unknown whether any user or procedural factors may have contributed to the stated event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|