(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported break and the reported stretched were able to be confirmed.The reported difficult to remove was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.As there was no damage noted to the guide wire during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that during removal resistance was met with the calcified lesion resulting in the reported difficulty to remove.Manipulation of the device resulted in the reported stretched coils, the noted bends (core, shaping ribbon) and ultimately resulted in the reported break/noted core separation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|