• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA MECTALIF OBLIQUE (TI PEEK) OBLIQUE INTERBODY FUSION DEVICE PEEK/TI 12X28X10 L5°

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA MECTALIF OBLIQUE (TI PEEK) OBLIQUE INTERBODY FUSION DEVICE PEEK/TI 12X28X10 L5° Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.26.045
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 11/27/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional comments provided by the surgeon: the primary surgery was the first experience of myspine surgery for the surgeon, so the surgeon was not familiar with the surgical procedure.The screw trajectory might have been different from the planning.The pedicle screw might have not been well fixed.The cage size might have been slightly larger.Batch review performed on 21 december 2018: lot 152173: (b)(4).Expiration date: 2021-05-19.No anomalies found related to the problem.(b)(4).The mysolution department review the patient match plan and commented as follows: our analysis of the myspine process of this case found no deviations from the standard procedures.Each step has been performed correctly.Clinical evaluation performed by medical affairs director: migration of interbody oblique cage in a case of primary lumbar stabilization with cortical bone trajectory.The surgeon felt that the cortical screws may have loosened slightly even during primary surgery, and tried to compensate with the use of cross-connectors, but after few weeks the cage mobilized anyway.It is conceivable that the cause for mobilization was insufficient stability provided by the construct, but no defective device has been identified and reported.The migreted cage has been repositioned and left in situ.
 
Event Description
Tlif surgery performed at l4-l6 with myspine mc guide on (b)(6) 2018.At that time the surgeon felt the pedicle screws might be loosened during compression at l5-l6, so in order to strengthen the fixation, the surgeon used total 2 cross connectors.The patient alleged pain about 2 weeks later after the primary surgery.The surgeon discovered the mectalif oblique cage implanted at l5-l6 was migrated to posterior side in the x-ray.Revision surgery performed on (b)(6)(1 month and a half after primary surgery), at that time the surgeon replaced the pedicle screw with new one and impacted the same mectalif oblique cage into the intervertebral disc space again.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MECTALIF OBLIQUE (TI PEEK) OBLIQUE INTERBODY FUSION DEVICE PEEK/TI 12X28X10 L5°
Type of Device
INTERBODY FUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA
strada regina
castel san pietro, switzerland 6874
SZ  6874
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA
strada regina
castel san pietro, switzerland 6874
SZ   6874
Manufacturer Contact
stefano baj
strada regina
castel san pietro, switzerland 6874
SZ   6874
MDR Report Key8188869
MDR Text Key131139418
Report Number3005180920-2018-01033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
UDI-Device Identifier07630030830648
UDI-Public07630030830648
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K133192
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/19/2021
Device Catalogue Number03.26.045
Device Lot Number152173
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/27/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured06/09/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-