Model Number PVS21 |
Device Problem
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Regurgitation (1716)
|
Event Date 11/14/2013 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Device not explanted.
|
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer was informed on this event through the (b)(6) registry.On (b)(6) 2012, an (b)(6) female patient received a perceval pvs21 to replace the native aortic valve.The procedure was performed in mini-thoracotomy and no concomitant procedures occurred.At discharge from the hospital, the echo showed a good device functionality (8mmhg mean gradient, no leaks).During the follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2013, the device was observed through the echo, which showed a mean gradient of 6mmhg and a central leak of 1+ (adverse event, non-structural dysfunction).The echo performed on (b)(6) 2015 showed an increase in the central leak (2+).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A complete manufacturing and material records review for the device has been performed.The results confirmed that the device satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.Since the device remains implanted in the patient, further investigation is not possible at this time.Based on the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were identified.Furthermore, according to the information provided by the site, there are no plans for re-intervention.As such, it can be reasonably concluded that no serious injury for the patient is identified.However, since no further investigation on the device could be performed, the root cause of the event remains unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer was informed on this event through the sure avr registry.On (b)(6) 2012, an 81 years old female patient received a perceval pvs21 to replace the native aortic valve.The procedure was performed in mini-thoracotomy and no concomitant procedures occurred.At discharge from the hospital, the echo showed a good device functionality (8mmhg mean gradient, no leaks).During the follow-up visit on 14 nov 2013, the device was observed through the echo, which showed a mean gradient of 6mmhg and a central leak of 1+ (adverse event, non-structural dysfunction).The echo performed on 17 mar 2015 showed an increase in the central leak (2+).The nyha class reported in the last follow up phone call was class iii.The site informed that there is no plan for a re-intervention.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|