On (b)(6) 2018, a percival pvs23 was implanted in aortic position through a full sternotomy.After the closure of the aorta, it was noticed that one of the leaflets were not opening correctly, because the device was mis-sized/oversized.The device was then explanted and replaced with an edwards magna ease.The patient remained stable during the procedure and did fine after surgery.The patient seemed to have normal anatomy.The percival pvs23 was discarded.
|
Corrected data: the device code selected for the initial report submitted was # (b)(4) (appropriate term/code not available).The code was now corrected to (b)(4).The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model #icv1209, s/n # (b)(4), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by quality engineering at livanova canada corp.The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model #icv1209) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Since the device was discarded, no inspection of the actual prosthesis can be performed.However, based on the surgeon's judgment and on the sizing of the device ultimately implanted, the root cause of the event can be attributable to the oversizing of the perceval valve.
|
On 03 oct 2018, a perceval pvs23 was implanted in aortic position through a full sternotomy.After the closure of the aorta, it was noticed that one of the leaflets were not opening correctly, because the device was mis-sized/oversized.The device was then explanted and replaced with an edwards magna ease 21mm.The patient remained stable during the procedure and did fine after surgery.There were only 20 minutes added to the x-clamp time.The patient seemed to have normal anatomy.The perceval pvs23 was discarded.
|