(b)(4).Batch # r94068.Investigation summary: the device was returned with the distal tip of the blade broken off and not returned.The remaining blade portion was scratched, and with evidence of contact with metal in or out of the operative field.This blade tip portion may have broken off of the device during transport to our analysis site.The reported complaint was for "replace the device".During functional testing on gen11 an alert screen was displayed.A probable cause of the device stop activating and display an alert screen is blade damage.The device was disassembled to inspect the internal components and no anomalies were found.Probable causes of blade damage, including breakage, are external contact during pre-op or general use, blade contact with other devices, staples or clips during the procedure.Once minor blade damage has occurred, subsequent activations may increase the severity of the blade damage.This in turn can result in failing the pre-run test with the generator and displaying an alert screen.These alert screens that can result are such as ¿tighten assembly¿, ¿blade error detected¿ or "relaxed pressure on blade" or " removed instrument from patient" followed by a ¿replace instrument¿ screen later in the procedure.Continued usage of the damage blade can result in a broken blade.A batch history record review was performed, and a defect was found during the manufacturing of this batch but was not related to the event description.Additionally no protocols or nc¿s related to the complaint were found during the manufacturing process.
|