The reported event was confirmed through functional testing and archive data review of the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)).The root cause is due to the defective load cell 2.Upon visual inspection, no physical damages were observed.The autopulse platform failed initial functional testing, as the platform displayed ua02 (compression tracking error) error message upon powering on.The archive data review showed occurrence of multiple ua02 error message on the customer reported event date ((b)(6) 2018).The defective load cell 2 was replaced to remedy this issue.Following the service, the autopulse was subjected to a 15 minutes run-in test using the 95% patient large resuscitation test fixture (lrtf) with good known test batteries until discharged without any fault or error.The brake gap inspection was performed and verified the brake gap was within the specification.Load cell characterization test was performed and confirmed both cell modules are functioning within the specification.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint and there was no previous history of complaint reported for autopulse platform with serial number (b)(4).The death was not related to the autopulse device.The autopulse is used as an adjunct to manual cpr in cases of clinical death.The benefit of using the autopulse is that it in part substitutes mechanical compressions for the physical labor of manual chest compressions.If the autopulse did not start or unexpectedly stops compressions, rescuer should revert to manual cpr, which is the standard of care.In this case, when the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was used on a (b)(6) male patient (weighed (b)(6)) in cardiac arrest, it stopped for an error message after performing on compression.The crew immediately treated the patient with another available autopulse platform.The patient was pronounced at the hospital.The autopulse was intended to be used as an adjunct to manual cpr on adult patients.In case of stoppage of autopulse the user reverts to manual cpr.The transition from autopulse to manual cpr by trained users is similar to the time necessary for rescuer rotation, and presents the same workflow as manual cpr.Hence, based on available information, the patients' outcome was not negatively impacted by the interruptions when compared to standard of care manual cpr.Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ohca) is one of the main causes of death in industrial nations.About 25% of patients survive this event and make it to the hospital, and even fewer patients survive after 24 hours (nichol, nejm, 2015).In the united states, survival to hospital discharge after non-traumatic emergency medical services-treated cardiac arrest with any first recorded rhythm was 10.6% for patients of any age.Of the bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in 2011, 31.4% of victims survived to hospital discharge (mozaffarian, circulation, 2016).Death is an expected outcome for ohca.
|
As reported, the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was used on a (b)(6) male patient (weighed (b)(6)) in cardiac arrest.The autopulse platform performed one compression and displayed ua02 (compression tracking error) error message.Immediately, the patient was treated with another autopulse platform available on scene.However, the patient was pronounced at the hospital.As per the user, the patient was down for an unknown period of time before the help arrived.Per user, the device issue does not contributed to patient's death.The ems supervisor readjusted the lifeband and tested the autopulse platform back at the station using mannequin and the ua02 error will not clear.
|