• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERSION SMALL, RIGHT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERSION SMALL, RIGHT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400254
Device Problem Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/02/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.The hospital disposed of the item.
 
Event Description
Today at st.Vincent healthcare we had a case in which we revised a previous star total ankle arthroplasty.Dr.Was the surgeon and told me before the case started that he would like to just pull the talar component and poly insert and then replace both of them with likely the same size, possibly a size smaller.He said that he suspects the talar component to be loose after viewing it before the operation in x-ray.The talar component was loose and he pulled it out and made a comment about how he saw no bony in-growth on the implant.We made a few adjustments and put in two new implants and the case went fairly smoothly, i just wanted to make sure to report his observation that there was virtually no bony in-growth on the talar component he removed.The issue was noticed during the operation when the surgeon removed the previously implanted talar component.
 
Event Description
Today at (b)(6) we had a case in which we revised a previous star total ankle arthroplasty.Dr.Was the surgeon and told me before the case started that he would like to just pull the talar component and poly insert and then replace both of them with likely the same size, possibly a size smaller.He said that he suspects the talar component to be loose after viewing it before the operation in x-ray.The talar component was loose and he pulled it out and made a comment about how he saw no bony in-growth on the implant.We made a few adjustments and put in two new implants and the case went fairly smoothly, i just wanted to make sure to report his observation that there was virtually no bony in-growth on the talar component he removed.The issue was noticed during the operation when the surgeon removed the previously implanted talar component.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event that talar comp, single coated us version small, right was alleged of 'implant - loose' could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.More detailed information about the complaint event such as x-rays, patient info as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.However, the opinion of one of stryker's medical experts was requested as to why no bone in growth was noticed.Their general statement says: ingrowth would be the optimum in total joint replacement.But it is dependent on several factors, besides prevention of (sub clinical) infection.Important is a very good initial stability.The ankle is the most loaded joint in the body and due to its shape initial stability is difficult to achieve.If it is not achieved, you will have micro motions.When micro motions occur there will be no bony in growth.The body will try to stabilize the situation with the development of very stiff and stable connective scar tissue.This is a general statement that could be applied to cases where no bone in growth can be noticed.As more specific evaluation is only possible if pre- and post- operative x-rays can be provided.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERSION SMALL, RIGHT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH  2545
MDR Report Key8283518
MDR Text Key134314538
Report Number0008031020-2019-00050
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTG
UDI-Device Identifier00886385016450
UDI-Public00886385016450
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/28/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number400254
Device Lot Number1451099
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/07/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-