(b)(4).Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation ongoing.Analysis and results: there are no previous complaints of this code-batch.We have received 4 closed samples and 3 used threads without needle connected (one of them shows splitting in the thread surface) and one used thread with needle connected.We have tested the needle attachment strength of the closed samples received and the results fulfill the requirements of the european pharmacopoeia (ep): (b)(4) kgf in average and (b)(4) kgf in minimum (ep requirements: (b)(4) kgf in average and (b)(4) kgf in minimum).However, we see that in two of the samples tested there appears to be splitting in the thread at the needle-attachment area during needle attachment strength test.On the other hand, we have tested the knot pull tensile strength of the closed samples received and the results fulfill the requirements of the ep: (b)(4) kgf in average and (b)(4) kgf in minimum (ep requirements: (b)(4) kgf in average and (b)(4) kgf in minimum).Review of the batch manufacturing records showed that this product had a normal process and the results during the process fulfill usp/ep and b.Braun surgical requirements.Final conclusion: the results of samples received do not fulfil the specifications of the ep/b.Braun surgical specifications, and we conclude that the complaint is confirmed taking account that the samples tested showed splitting.
|
It was reported that there was an issue with suture breakage/separation from the needle.The instances occurred during a product training and there was no patient involvement.One needle detached and one suture was noted to have had a split end.On (b)(6) 2019, it was noted that there was another suture detachment.This report involves the third needle detachment.Associated medwatches: 3003639970-2019-00003, 3003639970-2019-00022.
|